Writing Assessment Ch. 13
March 14, 2008
cc57241
There are several points that stood out to me in Best Practices Ch13. I felt like in this chapter the authors were more understanding of what the life of a teacher is like. I appreciated that factors such as lack of time and state testing were not ignored. For example, p. 266 states, “standards have to be met, content has to be covered, and the textbook has to be finished.” One thing I related to was the point that “no one seems to be teaching writing–kids are already expected to know how. ” I think I was guilty of thinking that way before actually teaching…I soon came to realize that my students knew very little about writing, and the only way they would learn is through my explicit teaching of it as a subject in and of itself. The chapter also talked about how writing should be focused on significant matters (authentic) and should be published for a specific audience. My kids have loved writing their penpal letters, because they think of it as a tool of communication, rather than an exercise. They have also enjoyed publishing an “ABC” book and are working on biographies to be published in a book from lulu.com. I also plan on cramming in a few digital assignments between now and the end of the year that can go on our class blog. It has really been rewarding for me to learn what works. Straying away from standard prompts has not just been more enjoyable for the kids, but it is more pleasurable for the teacher, too! I also thought it was important that the chapter distinguished content from process. It is so easy only to focus on one or the other when assessing. Before I started teaching, I spent so much time stressing over the students’ mechanical mistakes–practically driving myself insane! I quickly realized this year that I could only do so much convention-wise to catch-up my kids (who are drastically behind). I knew I needed to focus more on the content/communication aspect. Since I have started focusing more on content and less on mechancis, I have enjoyed teaching writing so much more and feel like a more effective, less stressed teacher. Also, I liked this quote on p. 279, “Seldom does a professional work on a problem (or write about it) with a closed book.” I definitely think that makes a good case for using text-based prompts. Finally, even though I am working on many digital ways to publish students’ work, I’m trying to find an area in the classroom to hang more work samples. I also want to work on a word wall. So many ideas, so little wall space!
Entry Filed under: Uncategorized
1 Comment Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to comments via RSS Feed
1.
Cher | March 18, 2008 at 8:50 pm
AMEN! I have made the same analogy about closed-book tests and doctors! If my doctor doesn’t know what is wrong with me, I certainly don’t want him going with his best guess! I want him to grab a book or a colleague and find out what he needs to do! The same with our students… In the real world we use resources in our jobs and for educational purposes. It makes no sense to me why we teach children to use dictionaries and thesauri, and the test them with being able to use either! The point of assessment is not to assign a “PASS” or “FAIL” label to a child… it is to see what they know and find where they need help and support. We hear about formative assessment all of the time, but rarely are we allowed to truly use our tests to shape instruction. They are instead used to compare us against our colleagues and occassionally to beat us over the head with! Thanks for sharing your ideas about this chapter, Caroline. We had many similar view points and it was good to hear that I’m not the only one with these frustrations!